Statement regarding Bill C-2 – November 24, 2016

Get the statement

Statement regarding Bill C-2 – November 24, 2016


A Senate news release pertaining to Bill C-2, dated November 22, 2016, was not clear and, although I appreciate that the news release was corrected on November 24, 2016, I still consider it necessary to bring some clarity to a quote that was attributed to the PBO in the November 22 version.

The statement in quotes was indeed from the PBO, but for greater clarify should have read as follows: “The shortfall is about $8.9 billion from 2015-2016 to 2020-2021 and about $1.7 billion annually from 2016-2017 to 2020-2021.” Moreover, the rest of the text, which read as follows: “The committee amended version would add no new deficit.” appeared to be from the PBO, but that is not the case. At no time did the PBO endorse the amendment put forward by the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance.

The PBO has published two reports pertaining to Bill C-2, one on May 17, 2016, entitled Financial Analysis of a Targeted Tax Credit for Taxpayers in the Second Bracket, and another on January 21, 2016, entitled, The Fiscal and Distributional Impact of Changes to the Federal Personal Income Tax Regime.

For more information, please call 613-992-8026

Jean-Denis Fréchette

Parliamentary Budget Officer

Related posts

  • 21 January 2016
    PBO estimates that the introduction of the new 33 per cent personal income tax (PIT) rate and the reduction of the
    second tax rate to 20.5 per cent will reduce PIT revenues by $0.4 billion in 2015-16 and about $1.7 billion annually
    on average from 2016-17 to 2020-21. Reducing the first personal income tax rate from 15.0 to 14.0 per cent would
    reduce PIT revenue by $0.9 billion in 2015-16 and about $4.1 billion on average annually from 2016-17 to 2020-21.
    Introducing the new tax bracket for taxable income over $200,000 at a rate of 33.0 per cent will primarily affect the
    top 1.4 percent of taxpayers. The second bracket change will affect the top 30 percent of taxpayers, while a
    reduction in the first bracket would affect the top 60 percent of taxpayers.
  • 17 May 2016

    In response to a request from Senator Larry Smith, Chair of the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance, the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) uses four methods to estimate the level of a hypothetical benefit available to taxpayers in the second tax bracket, where the overall cost of these benefits is equivalent in size to the estimated level of revenues generated from introducing a 33.0 per cent tax rate on income over $200,000.